Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

IMPROVING NUTRIENT AND MOISTURE RETENTION IN PINE BARK SUBSTRATES WITH ROCKWOOL AND COMPOST COMBINATIONS

Article number
342_30
Pages
265 – 272
Language
Abstract
Cotoneaster dammeri Schneid. ‘Skogholm’ were potted into combinations of pine bark (PB), horticultural rockwool (RW), composted municipal yardwaste (CYW), composted turkey broiler litter (TBL) and washed builders sand (S). The objective of the study was to characterize the physical and chemical properties and subsequent plant growth and foliar tissue levels of the resultant substrates.
Of the physical parameters tested the three component substrates PB:RW:CYW and PB:RW:TBL (70:20:10 by v) appeared to have the most consistent favorable physical properties with higher total porosities and available water content, equivalent air space and container capacity and lower unavailable water content than the pine bark control substrate.
Electrical conductivity (EC) was extremely high the first day after initiation (DAI) in the substrates containing TBL but was not different for other sampling dates.
Leachate pH initially ranged from 4.9 to 6.1 but through most of the study ranged from 5.2 to 5.8. As with EC all nutrient levels were very high one day after initiation.
Leachate phosphate levels were maintained at recommended levels in the substrates containing TBL throughout most of the study while other substrates were generally deficient.
The same was true for foliar tissue phosphate levels.
The greatest top dry weight was yielded in the PB:RW:TBL (70:20:10, by v) substrate and least in the PB:S (80:20) substrate.

Publication
Authors
T.E. Bilderback, W.C. Fonteno
Keywords
air space, bulk density, particle size distribution, available water capacity, unavailable water
Full text
Online Articles (45)
E.A. van Os | R.P. van Zuijdam | A.T.M. Hendrix | V.J.M. Koch
F.X. Martínez | X. Fàbregas | L. Tapia | A. Caballero
L.M. Rivière | S. Charpentier | B. Jeannin | B. Kafka
A. Vanachter | C. Van Assche | E. Van Wambeke
M. Martorell | M. Soliva | N. Cañameras | F.X. Martínez | M. dos Reis
U. Tomati | E. Galli | R. Buffone | J. Cegarra Rosique | A. Roig
M. Hansen | H. Grønborg | N. Starkey | L. Hansen
S. Bures | F. A. Pokorny | David P. Landau | Mark A. Farmer | Alan M. Ferrenberg
F.X. Martínez | N. Cañameras | F.X. Fábregas | M. Viñals | J. Valero | M. Reis
M.T. Aguado | M.C. Ortega | M.T. Moreno | M.P. Suarez
M. Soliva | D. Villalba | B. Vilarasau | M. Arbiol