Articles
PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES IN BOTANICAL GARDENS
Article number
651_2
Pages
35 – 44
Language
English
Abstract
The worlds botanical gardens house some 80,000100,000 species, and ca. 15,000 species hereof are threatened in the wild.
However, representation of natural biodiversity is imbalanced.
There is strong bias towards certain plant families and genera, and towards certain functional groups.
Apart from this, bias towards species from temperate regions as a result of the imbalance in geographic distribution of botanical gardens is obvious.
Tropical regions and the southern hemisphere are highly underrepresented.
Most species cultivated in botanical gardens are on an average represented by only two or three specimens, and the genetic diversity within wild species is not reflected.
Further limitations include poor documentation and poor maintenance.
These limitations reduce the value of the collections as plant genetic resources.
However, botanical gardens are the standard institutions for ex situ conservation and propagation of wild plants and should be the main authorities for wild plants.
With their huge collections on display botanical gardens are the most effective multipliers for increasing public awareness of the value of biodiversity and conservation needs.
There is growing awareness of the ecological, economic and cultural significance of wild plant species and their potential value as genetic resources.
Botanical gardens should establish seed gene banks for wild plants for promoting integrated conservation efforts and for protection and conservation of our natural plant genetic resources.
They should establish database networks and should provide information services for science, politics and the general public.
Botanical gardens play a significant role in promoting public awareness of the value of biodiversity.
They have a remarkable potential to contribute to the conservation of plant genetic resources.
However, representation of natural biodiversity is imbalanced.
There is strong bias towards certain plant families and genera, and towards certain functional groups.
Apart from this, bias towards species from temperate regions as a result of the imbalance in geographic distribution of botanical gardens is obvious.
Tropical regions and the southern hemisphere are highly underrepresented.
Most species cultivated in botanical gardens are on an average represented by only two or three specimens, and the genetic diversity within wild species is not reflected.
Further limitations include poor documentation and poor maintenance.
These limitations reduce the value of the collections as plant genetic resources.
However, botanical gardens are the standard institutions for ex situ conservation and propagation of wild plants and should be the main authorities for wild plants.
With their huge collections on display botanical gardens are the most effective multipliers for increasing public awareness of the value of biodiversity and conservation needs.
There is growing awareness of the ecological, economic and cultural significance of wild plant species and their potential value as genetic resources.
Botanical gardens should establish seed gene banks for wild plants for promoting integrated conservation efforts and for protection and conservation of our natural plant genetic resources.
They should establish database networks and should provide information services for science, politics and the general public.
Botanical gardens play a significant role in promoting public awareness of the value of biodiversity.
They have a remarkable potential to contribute to the conservation of plant genetic resources.
Publication
Authors
H. Hurka, B. Neuffer, N. Friesen
Keywords
Potentials of collections, limitations of collections, conservation efforts, seed gene banks, wild plants, mission statement
Online Articles (21)