Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

Canopy management in super high-density olive orchards: relationship between canopy light penetration, canopy size and productivity

Article number
1177_9
Pages
87 – 92
Language
English
Abstract
In super-high density olive orchards, canopy size is constrained by the size of the harvesting machine and canopy efficiency is limited by reciprocal tree shading.
Thus, correct management of light distribution within the tree canopy and the use of large canopy volumes are essential means for obtaining large orchard yield.
We conducted experiments on ‘Arbequina’ and ‘Maurino’ olive trees trained in super-high density olive orchards to assess the effect of pruning strategy on light distribution, shoot and tree productivity and to determine how to optimize canopy management for high tree productivity and mechanical harvesting.
Shoot flowering was closely related to light exposure during the previous summer and to shoot length.
On this basis a pruning technique based on the yearly thinning of branches (selective pruning) was evaluated to reduce canopy density and improve light distribution and at the same time increase canopy volume (with flexible branches compatible with overhead harvesting machines). The new selective pruning strategy improved light distribution, increased canopy size and improved yield compared to mechanical topping, which is currently the most common pruning system in high density olives.

Publication
Authors
S. Tombesi, D. Farinelli
Keywords
‘Arbequina’, ‘Maurino’, pruning, light interception, branch elasticity
Full text
Online Articles (59)
L. Corelli Grappadelli | G. Lopez | L. Manfrini | M. Zibord | B. Morandi | R. Bastias | P. Losciale
T. Deckers | H. Schoofs | W. Verjans | D. Bylemans | P. Janssens
F. Scandellari | G. Liguori | G. Caruso | F. Meggio | P. Inglese | R. Gucci | A. Pitacco | G. Celano | M. Tagliavini
R.P. Marini | R.M. Crassweller | W. Autio | R. Moran | T.L. Robinson | J. Cline | D. Wolfe | R. Parra-Quezada
N. Dallabetta | F. Costa | M. Giordan | A. Guerra | J. Pasqualini | R. Wehrens | G. Costa
H.F. Rapoport | S.B.M. Hammami | A. Rosati | R. Gucci
L. Rufato | A.F. Brighenti | A.D. Rufato | L.I. Dominguez | T.L. Robinson
A.-L. Krasniqi | M.M. Blanke | A. Kunz | L. Damerow | A.N. Lakso | M. Meland
C. Zhou | B. Liu | A.N. Lakso | T.L. Robinson | S. Gan
C. Hernández | M. Bravo | P. Pimentel | M. Pinto | M.T. Pino
F.P. Marra | A.A. Roxas | R. Lo Bianco | G. Marino | T. Caruso
C. Xiloyannis | G. Montanaro | A.N. Mininni | B. Dichio
N. Hias | K. De Dauw | M.W. Davey | L. Leus | M.C. Van Labeke | J. Van Huylenbroeck | J. Keulemans
S.A. Bound | A. Eyles | G. Oliver | S. Paterson | J. Direen | R. Corkrey | M. Hardie | D.C. Close