Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION RATES ON KIWIFRUIT GROWTH AND CROPPING

Article number
335_27
Pages
235 – 240
Language
Abstract
Irrigation experiments using micro-sprinklers were carried out to determine the effects of water status on fruit development and crop load.
Three irrigation treatments of 36, 63 and 100% evapotranspiration (ET) were applied in young kiwifruit vines, using a dry treatment as a control.
Pre-dawn leaf water potentials (LWP’s) were used as the index of water stress, using a pressure chamber.
Volumes of labeled fruit were measured by water displacement in a graduated cylinder.
Fruit development was directly related to water availability.
There were significant differences (p<0.05) among the rates applied in the LWP’s and in the fruit volumes, since the sixth week after full bloom.
However, there were not significant differences (p<0.05) between the dry and the 36% ET rates.
Pre-dawn LWP from water stressed vines was <-0.1 MPa, whereas the 100% ET irrigated vines was -0.02 MPa.
These vines gave higher yield and fruit size.
According to these results and the climatology of Asturias, it is recommended to irrigate with the 100% ET. Special care must be taken concerning the water requirements in the period beginning six weeks after full bloom, in order to optimise the final fruit size.

Publication
Authors
M. Ciordia, M.B. Díaz, M. Coque, J. Gómez Aparisi
Keywords
Kiwifruit, irrigation, leaf water potential (LWP), crop load, fruit weight
Full text
Online Articles (71)
F. Cabrera | A. Reyes | E. Fernández-Boy | J.A. Cayuela | J.M. Murillo | F. Moreno
R. Llorca | I. Bautista | J. Oliver | G. Cruz-Romero
C. Cadahía | Ma. L. Segura | E. Eymar | M. Martinez | A. Navarro | C. Gil
A. Gallego | J.C. López-Hernández | J. López-Gálvez | N. Castilla
J.J. Baselga Yrisarry | M.H. Prieto Losada | A. Rodríguez del Rincón
J.E. Fernández | F. Moreno | J. Martín-Aranda
T. Simonneau | R. Habib | J.-P. Goutouly | J.-G Huguet | A. Lecomte
A. Torrecillas | M.C. Ruiz-Sánchez | J. Hernández-Borroto | R. Domingo
M. Ciordia | M.B. Díaz | M. Coque | J. Gómez Aparisi
J.L. SANTANA | C.L. SUAREZ | E. FERERES
M. Cohen | J. Girona | T. Ameglio | P. Cruiziat | P. Archer | C. Valancogne
M. Mastrorilli | N. Losavio | G. Rana | N. Katerji
P. Lorenzo | E. Medrano | M. García
J.L. Valenzuela | A. del Río | I. López-Cantarero | A. Sánchez | L. Romero
A. Losada | L.R. Sinobas | L. Juana | M. Rodríguez | J. Roldán | M. Alcaide
D.F. Wanjura | D.R. Upchurch | J.R. Mahan
E. Camacho | J. Roldán | M. Alcaide
F. Bigaran | G. Toller | P. Pisa | C. Agnolin
J. López-Gálvez | N. Castilla | F. Orgaz | E. Fereres