Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE, CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION, DAY LENGTH AND PHOTON FLUX DENSITY ON GROWTH, MORPHOGENESIS AND FLOWERING OF MINIATURE ROSES

Article number
378_8
Pages
63 – 70
Language
Abstract
The effect of three temperature treatments including constant temperature (CT), day temperature lower than the night temperature (negative DIF), and a 2-h low temperature pulse in the morning (DROP) were studied in 18 growth chambers illuminated by artificial light.
The CT and negative DIF were studied at two carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations (360 and 900 μmol mol-1), two photosynthetic photon flux densities (85 and 130 μmol m-2s-1 PPFD) and two daylengths (12 and 18 h day-1 DL). The DROP treatment was included only at low CO2 concentration at short days.

The plant height, and particularly the plant diameter at flowering, were significantly increased by increasing the light dose (i.e. increasing DL or PPFD). Elevated CO2 concentration also increased the diameter while negative DIF had no effect on the two parameters compared to at CT. No interactive effects between temperature, CO2, DL and PPFD were found on plant height and diameter.
The DROP treatment had no effect on these two parameters as compared to the other temperature treatments.

The plant dry weight at flowering was slightly increased by negative DIF (compared to CT) at low CO2 and slightly decreased at high CO2. The DROP treatment had no effect on the dry weight.

Negative DIF compared to CT delayed flowering by a few days at low CO2 and hastened it at high CO2. The DROP treatment delayed flowering compared to the two other temperature treatments.
The total number of flowers and flower buds were slightly increased by negative DIF (compared to CT) and CO2 enrichment, and was strongly influenced by increasing the light dose (i.e. increasing DL or PPFD).

It was concluded that the morphology of miniature roses could not be controlled by negative DIF or DROP irrespective of CO2 concentration, DL and PPFD.

Publication
Authors
Leiv M. Mortensen, R. Moe
Keywords
Full text
Online Articles (20)
R. Moe | K. Willumsen | I.H. Ihlebekk | A.I. Stupa | N.M. Glomsrud | L.M. Mortensen