Articles
A COMPARISON OF APPLE AND PEAR SEEDLINGS WITH REFERENCE TO THE JUVENILE PERIOD. I. SEEDLING GROWTH AND YIELD.
Article number
56_22
Pages
205 – 214
Language
Abstract
Several thousand apple and pear seedlings of many progenies were studied in connection with their juvenile period (J.P.). The initially significant inverse relation between the vigour (stem diameter) and the J.P. of seedlings became insignificant as the trees grew older, due to a retardation of growth occurring when the seedlings become generative.
This relation can be used effectively in preselecting for vigour in the nursery.
Cumulative yields were higher when the J.P. was shorter, but there was no evident link between the J.P. and annual yield in full bearing, that is to say, precocity and productivity are not directly connected.
Better growing conditions and pre-selection have shortened the mean progeny J.P. of either crop by three years since the 1950’s.
Generally, the pear seedlings appear to grow faster, to become generative slower and to yield lower than comparable apple seedlings.
The mean J.P. of apple and pear progenies averaged 4.2 and 6.0 years respectively.
The difference between apple and pear may be attributable to a greater selection pressure on both precocity and productivity with apple than with pear.
This relation can be used effectively in preselecting for vigour in the nursery.
Cumulative yields were higher when the J.P. was shorter, but there was no evident link between the J.P. and annual yield in full bearing, that is to say, precocity and productivity are not directly connected.
Better growing conditions and pre-selection have shortened the mean progeny J.P. of either crop by three years since the 1950’s.
Generally, the pear seedlings appear to grow faster, to become generative slower and to yield lower than comparable apple seedlings.
The mean J.P. of apple and pear progenies averaged 4.2 and 6.0 years respectively.
The difference between apple and pear may be attributable to a greater selection pressure on both precocity and productivity with apple than with pear.
This possibly also led to a smaller tree in the productive phase on the assumption that tree size at first flowering – small at a short, large at a long, J.P. – expresses reproductive efficiency and as such is reflected in the size of the adult tree.
Publication
Authors
T. Visser, J.J. Verhaegh, D.P. de Vries
Keywords
Online Articles (36)
