Articles
WATER POTENTIAL AND FRUIT GROWTH AS MANAGEMENT INDICATORS IN TRICKLE-IRRIGATION IN ‘ROCHA’ PEAR
Article number
909_37
Pages
331 – 337
Language
English
Abstract
Aiming to study the physiological responses and the effect on yield and final fruit size of three irrigation treatments in a Rocha pear orchard, climatic and crop status indicators were monitored.
Irrigation amounts of 0, 98 and 265 mm were applied in the DRY, Deficit Irrigation (DI) and Maximum Water Availability (MWA) treatments, respectively.
In the MWA treatment daily irrigation was applied, while in DI the irrigation was only applied when the pre-dawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) reached a pre-established threshold depending on the development stage of the crop (-0.5 to -0.8 MPa). The results showed an increase in tree yield with the irrigation applied (DRY=25.4 kg tree-1; DI=29.7 kg tree-1; MWA=31.5 kg tree-1) without statistically significant differences between the two irrigated treatments.
DI showed a superior ratio of fruits above 65 mm diameter, 10% greater TSS when compared with MWA, and the best economic result.
Water use was 63% lower in DI, when compared with MWA. This irrigation treatment caused an economic benefit of 2.73 per m3 of applied water, while this value was 7.51 per m3 in DI.
Irrigation amounts of 0, 98 and 265 mm were applied in the DRY, Deficit Irrigation (DI) and Maximum Water Availability (MWA) treatments, respectively.
In the MWA treatment daily irrigation was applied, while in DI the irrigation was only applied when the pre-dawn leaf water potential (ΨPD) reached a pre-established threshold depending on the development stage of the crop (-0.5 to -0.8 MPa). The results showed an increase in tree yield with the irrigation applied (DRY=25.4 kg tree-1; DI=29.7 kg tree-1; MWA=31.5 kg tree-1) without statistically significant differences between the two irrigated treatments.
DI showed a superior ratio of fruits above 65 mm diameter, 10% greater TSS when compared with MWA, and the best economic result.
Water use was 63% lower in DI, when compared with MWA. This irrigation treatment caused an economic benefit of 2.73 per m3 of applied water, while this value was 7.51 per m3 in DI.
Publication
Authors
A. Pacheco, J. Azevedo, C.M. Oliveira
Keywords
deficit irrigation, economic evaluation, leaf water potential, Pyrus communis, sugar content, water productivity
Online Articles (95)
