Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

ASSESSMENT OF ARKANSAS PECAN INDUSTRY TO INCREASE THE INDUSTRY’S COMPETITIVENESS AND ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

Article number
1070_26
Pages
231 – 234
Language
English
Abstract
Pecan (Carya illinoinensis (Wang.) K. Koch) production in Arkansas is among the least efficient in the United States.
To determine causes of low production efficiency and to help the industry become more competitive, two complementary survey tools were used to assess the industry.
The first tool included soil and foliar sampling and season-long disease and insect monitoring on 14 farms in areas representative of the pecan production regions of the state.
On site monitoring continued for 3 years.
The second tool was a written survey which was mailed to farmers and industry representatives.
Results indicate several sub-optimal practices are likely contributing to reduced production.
Areas where farmers do not follow recommendations include fertilizing irregularly and taking soil and foliar samples infrequently.
A majority of respondents reported not taking foliar samples at all, or collecting soil samples once in the previous five years.
The soil samples taken on site indicate a number of chemical fertility imbalances, including low Ca:Mg ratio; low K; high P, Zn, and Fe; and pH values ranging from 4.9 to 8.0. The most commonly reported diseases were pecan scab and downy mildew, which were prevalent.
Pecan nut casebearer was not captured at several surveyed locations, but was captured in previously unreported locations.
Overall results indicate the need for farmer education and implementation of best management practices to improve production efficiency.
Education programs based on the results of the assessment have been developed, and on-site monitoring continues with cooperation from farmers.

Publication
Authors
M.E. Garcia, D.A. Dickey, D.T. Johnson , B. Cowell
Keywords
assessment, disease, insects, soil, foliar, Carya illinoinensis
Full text
Online Articles (28)
Rui Zhang | Fangren Peng | Youwang Liang | Mingzhuo Hao | Yongrong Li
J.J. Randall | A. Rascon | R.J. Heerema | M.T. Potter
J. Jenkins | B. Wilson | J. Grimwood | J. Schmutz | L.J. Grauke
W. Chaney | Yuanhong Han | C. Rohla | M.J. Monteros | L.J. Grauke
B. Cowell | D.T. Johnson | R. Mizell | M.E. Garcia
T.E. Cottrell | B.W. Wood | C.M. Paulsen | X. Ni | J.R. Ruberson
C.H. Bock | M.W. Hotchkiss | T.E. Cottrell | B.W. Wood
K.E. Hummer | J.D. Postman | J.E. Preece
C.H. Bock | B.W. Wood | T.R. Gottwald
P. Weckler | C. Jones | T. Bowser | J. Hardin | Ning Wang | A. Franzen | S. Mathanker | N. Maness | M. Smith
V. Varela | V. Takata | G. Camussi | R. Zoppolo