Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

INFLUENCE OF CO2 ENRICHMENT REGIME ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND YIELD OF A TOMATO CROP

Article number
268_5
Pages
63 – 70
Language
Abstract
Tomato plants var.
Melody were grown in two greenhouses at the Centre de Recherches d’Avignon, in the South of France, where two CO2 enrichment regimes were compared:

  • Standard regime with setpoint at 1000 ppm, 6 hours per day (treatment C1000)

  • Simulation of a CO2 enrichment technique using the smoke exhausts from the boiler used to heat the greenhouse (treatment Cs).

We measured in situ photosynthesis of leaves at different periods during the experiment, first before enrichment was applied, then during the CO2 enrichment period.

These measurements were analyzed by fitting a leaf photosynthesis model to the data for each period; this curve fitting showed that when the amount of CO2 feeded to the plants is low (setpoint at 1000–1500 ppm ; less than 2 hours per day) there is no acclimation effect on leaf assimilation ; but when the enrichment is stronger (6 hours per day at 1000 ppm or 2 hours at 2500–3500 ppm) the acclimation effect reduces significantly the assimilation during the non-enriched hours of the day.

The number and weight of fruits produced was measured for each of the three trusses ; the analysis of these results shows that the C5 treatment can give the same yield as the standard regime C1000, provided the maximum CO2 concentration in the greenhouse is maintained below a limit of 2000–2500 ppm.

Publication
Authors
J.J. Longuenesse
Keywords
Full text
Online Articles (17)
L. Combe | J.M. Bertolini | P. Quétin | P. Locher