Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

STUDIES ON PEACH DOUBLE ROW PLANTING SYSTEMS

Article number
65_31
Pages
217 – 228
Language
Abstract
Trials were carried out for five years on 4 peach varieties (‘Fayette’, ‘Cresthaven’, ‘Suncrest’ and ‘Glohaven’) grown in the coastal area of Tuscany (Middle Italy). Four hundred trees of each variety were planted.

The trees, grafted on seedlings, were trained as sprint palmettes in a single row (555 trees/ha), and as ‘free spindles’ in double rows (at six different densities, 1 230; 1 330; 1 540; 1 600; 2 050; 2 220 trees/ha). ‘Fayette’ was also trained as a modified palmette in a single row, the trees being spaced at shorter distances (4.5 x 2.0) than sprint palmettes.

The first five years’ data show that with the peach high density systems offer interesting possibilities, in spite of the lack of dwarfing rootstocks.

Increasing the density, and using suitable varieties, it is possible to utilise root competition to reduce tree size and to reach higher yields in shorter time than with sprint palmettes.

After four crops from all varieties, cumulative yields per tree were highest with ‘sprint palmettes’ (87–107 kg/tree), followed by double rows with 1 230 trees/ha (65–75 kg/tree).

Cumulative yields per hectare were higher from double rows with 2 050 trees/ha (108–103 tons/ha) than with the higher density (2 220 trees/ha) planting.

Generally, cumulative yields were not directly proportional to plant density, but they were 2.2 to 1.4 times higher than the cumulative crops from sprint palmettes.
The modified palmettes yielded 1.55 times more fruit than did sprint palmettes.

Publication
Authors
R. Guerriero, F. Loreti, S. Morini
Keywords
Full text
Online Articles (41)
F. Loreti | R. Guerriero | S. Morini
J.E. Jackson | J.D. Quinlan | A.P. Preston
R. Guerriero | F. Loreti | S. Morini
D.W. McKenzie | R.J. Hutton | J.S. Dunn | M. Stolp