Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

BIOMASS AND NUTRIENT ACCUMULATION BY APPLE TREES GROWN IN A COMMERCIAL NURSERY

Article number
721_2
Pages
27 – 32
Language
English
Abstract
Two trials to determine the influence of various management practices on the performance of apple (Malus × domestica) trees grown in the Los Olmos commercial nursery, located in San Fernando, VI Region, Chile were conducted.
The first trial was conducted during the 1997-98 growing season and examined the effect of N fertilization rate (0 to 400 kg ha-1 N as urea) on biomass and nutrient accumulation by ‘Royal Gala’, ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Red Chief Delicious’ trees grafted on 1- and 2-year-old MM.106 rootstocks.
Biomass accumulation by the ‘Royal Gala’ and ‘Red Chief’ trees was unaffected by N rate, while the maximum growth of ‘Granny Smith’ trees occurred at 100 kg N ha-1. The amounts of N present in apple trees exceeded fertilizer N rates in the 0, 100 and 200 kg N ha-1 application treatments.
About half of the N was partitioned to the leaves, with the shoots and roots each containing about 25%. The second trial was conducted during the 2003-04 growing season and examined the effect of rootstock and scion combination on tree biomass and nutrient accumulation (T1: 1-year-old M.9 rootstock with no grafted scion; 2) T2: 1-year-old ‘Galaxy’ scion grafted on 1-year-old M.9 rootstock; 3) T3: 1-year-old ‘Galaxy’ scion grafted on 2-year-old M.9 rootstock). Maximum accumulation of fresh matter was achieved in T3, with around 450 g plant-1 vs. 254 g plant-1 in T1. Nutrient extraction varied from 90 kg N ha-1 in T1, to 138 kg N ha-1 for T3.

Publication
Authors
J.A. Yuri, V. Lepe, C. Moggia, J.L. Vasquez
Keywords
Malus × domestica, mineral nutrition, fertilizer, rootstock, nitrogen
Full text
Online Articles (49)
D.M. Eissenstat | T.L. Bauerle | L.H. Comas | A.N. Lakso | D. Neilsen | G.H. Neilsen | D.R. Smart
B.W. Wood | C.C. Reilly | A.P. Nyczepir
R. Grasa | I. Claveria | M.P. Paniagua | J. Abadia | A. Abadia
G. Colugnati | G. Cattarossi | G. Crespan | D. Porro | R. Zironi | G. Di Tommaso | A. Piaggesi
D. Malaguti | A.D. Rombola | M. Quartieri | A. Lucchi | C. Inderst | B. Marangoni | M. Tagliavini
J.A. Yuri | Y. Jorquera | V. Lepe | C. Moggia | A. Neira
M. Policarpo | M. Stefanini | R. Lo Bianco | L. Di Marco
E. Fallahi | B. Fallahi | J.B. Retamales | C. Valdés | S.J. Tabatabaei
L.M. Boyd | I.B. Ferguson | T.G. Thorp | N. De Silva | A.D. Mowat | A.M. Barnett
C. Sotomayor | J. Castro | V. De Pede | R. Ruiz
R.M. Boaretto | M.F. Giné | A.E. Boaretto | J.A. Quaggio
A.E. Boaretto | F.Z. Ueta | P.C.O. Trivelin | T. Muraoko | D. Mattos Jr
C. Neto | C. Carranca | A. de Varennes | C. Oliveira | J. Clemente | J. Sobreiro