Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF DIFFUSE LIGHT ON CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS

Article number
593_4
Pages
39 – 45
Language
English
Abstract
A layered canopy model was used to analyze the effects of diffuse light on canopy gross photosynthesis in controlled environment plant growth chambers, where, in contrast to the field, highly diffuse light can occur at high irradiance.
The model suggests that high diffuse light fractions (~ 0.7) and irradiance (1400 µmol m-2 s-1) may enhance crop life-cycle canopy gross photosynthesis for hydroponic wheat by about 20% compared to direct light at the same irradiance.
Our simulations suggest that high accuracy is not needed in specifying diffuse light fractions in chambers between ~ 0.7 and 1, because simulated photosynthesis for closed canopies plateau in this range.
We also examined the effect of leaf angle distribution on canopy photosynthesis under growth chamber conditions, as these distributions determine canopy extinction coefficients for direct and diffuse light.
We show that the spherical leaf angle distribution is not suitable for modeling photosynthesis of planophile canopies (e.g., soybean and peanut) in growth chambers.
Also, the absorption of the light reflected from the surface below the canopy should generally be included in model simulations, as the corresponding albedo values in the photosynthetically active range may be quite high in growth chambers (e.g., ~ 0.5). In addition to the modeling implications, our results suggest that diffuse light conditions should be considered when drawing conclusions from experiments in controlled environments.

Publication
Authors
J. Cavazzoni, T. Volk, F. Tubiello, O. Monje
Keywords
CERES-Wheat, Triticum aestivum L., leaf-angle distribution, growth chamber
Full text
Online Articles (31)
E. Dayan | E. Presnov | M. Fuchs | J. Ben Asher
G.S. McMaster | J.C. Ascough II | G.H. Dunn | M.A. Weltz | M.J. Shaffer | D. Palic | B.C. Vandenberg | P.N.S. Bartling | D. Edmunds | D.L. Hoag | L.R. Ahuja
E. Presnov | E. Dayan | M. Fuchs | Z. Plaut | E. Matan
A..G. richardson | K.R. Reddy | M.L. Boone
C. Sauviller | W. Baets | H. Pien | R. Lemeur