Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

Cultivar susceptibility and stress hormone response in raspberry (Rubus ideaus) to two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae)

Article number
1277_60
Pages
417 – 424
Language
English
Abstract
The two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) is a common pest on raspberry (Rubus ideaus), especially when cultivated under cover.
In three experiments we studied susceptibility to spider mite in six raspberry cultivars: ‘Carmina’, ‘Esperanza’, ‘Maravilla’, ‘Polka’, ‘Riviera’ and ‘Tulameen’. Individual leaves of long cane plants were inoculated with 10 spider mites.
The first two experiments showed the lowest number of spider mites on ‘Carmina’ and ‘Riviera’ and the highest on ‘Polka’ and ‘Maravilla’. In the third experiment the lowest number of mites were found on ‘Carmina’ and the highest number on ‘Tulameen’ and ‘Polka’. Two raspberry cultivars: ‘Carmina’ (resistant) and ‘Maravilla’ (more susceptible) were chosen to study the response of stress hormones upon spider mite infestation.
Both cultivars were grown as a dense crop in a greenhouse and inoculated with spider mites to establish one treatment with high infestation and one with low infestation.
During four weeks, number of mites (adults, nymphs, larvae and eggs) were counted and leaf samples were taken for LC-MS/MS analysis of the stress hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA). Leaf samples taken at the start of the experiment (week 0) served as a control before infestation.
For both genotypes and for both infestation levels, the concentrations of SA did not differ significantly either before or after infestation.
Notably, the JA concentrations dropped in both cultivars and for both infestation levels, to levels up to ten times lower at 7 days post inoculation (dpi). Only in ‘Maravilla’ the level of JA increased again at 28 dpi in the low and high infestation level, although only in the high infestation level spider mite numbers were decreasing.
It is known that JA levels often increase as a response to herbivores like spider mites.
However, spider mites also can interfere with the stress response in the plant by influencing stress hormone levels.
Therefore it is probable that for the tested raspberry cultivars the decrease of the JA levels is due to defence suppression caused by the spider mites.

Publication
Authors
L. Leus, C. Minguely, C. Van Poucke, J. Audenaert, J. Witters
Keywords
genotype, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, spider mite resistance
Full text
Online Articles (71)
J.D. Zurn | R. Meiers | J. Ward | C.E. Finn | M. Dossett | N.V. Bassil
M.L. Worthington | R. Aryal | N.V. Bassil | D. Mead | G.E. Fernandez | J.R. Clark | F. Fernández-Fernández | C.E. Finn | K.E. Hummer | H. Ashrafi
C.E. Finn | M.E. Peterson | J.R. Clark | G.E. Fernandez | H.K. Hall | M.L. Worthington
A. Orzeł | K. Król-Dyrek | J. Jagła | W. Lech | M. Bieniasz | M. Krośniak
M. Willman | J.M. Bushakra | N.V. Bassil | C.E. Finn | M. Dossett | P. Perkins-Veazie | C.M. Bradish | G.E. Fernandez | C.A. Weber | J. Scheerens | L. Dunlap | J. Fresnedo-Ramírez
W.L. Wu | H.X. Liu | L.F. Lyu | W.L. Li
C. Mulch | N.V. Bassil | C.E. Finn | M. Dossett | K.J. Vining
J.M. Bushakra | L.A. Alice | K.A. Carter | M. Dossett | J.C. Lee | A. Liston | R. Meiers | C. Mulch | A.M. Nyberg | M.E. Peterson | M. Clark | K.J. Vining | M.L. Worthington | M.H. Yin | B.L. Sutherland | J.D. Zurn | J.R. Clark | C.E. Finn | N.V. Bassil | K.E. Hummer
F.F. Sazonov | S.N. Evdokimenko | V.N. Sorokopudov | N.V. Andronova | D.N. Skovorodnikov
G. Heijerman | L. Helmus-Schuddebeurs | C.W. van Eldik
M. Boonen | P. Putzeys | D. Bylemans
C.H. Tan | H.P. Dai | J. Lu | W. Shi
A. Asănică | F. Stănică | A. Iacob | L. Perojuc | M. Ungurenuș
H. Hatterman-Valenti | A. Espe | J. Stenger | C. Auwarter
S.N. Evdokimenko | F.F. Sazonov | M.A. Podgaetsky | D.N. Skovorodnikov
F. Will | E. Krüger | K. Kumar | C. Patz | A. Sønsteby
K. Lepaja | E. Kullaj | L. Lepaja | N. Krasniqi
C. Ioriatti | G. Anfora | A. Grassi | S. Puppato | M.V. Rossi Stacconi
J. Špak | J. Přibylová | K. Petrzik | I. Koloniuk | D. Kubelková
T. Gasparski | P. Krawiec | M. Korzeniowski | M. Krawiec
C.W. Labrie | S.J. Sijtsema | H.M. Snoek | I. Raaijmakers | L.H. Aramyan
L. Giongo | M. Ajelli | P. Poncetta | M. Ramos-García | P. Sambo | B. Farneti
S. Gabioud Rebeaud | V. Varone | L. Vuong | P.Y. Cotter | A. Ançay | D. Christen
R.T. Threlfall | A.N. Dunteman | J.R. Clark | M.L. Worthington
V.A. Gudkovskii | L.V. Kozhina | M.Y. Akimov | T.V. Zhidekhina