Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

GENETIC VARIATION OF PLANT WATER STATUS, WATER USE EFFICIENCY AND GRAPE YIELD AND QUALITY IN RESPONSE TO SOIL WATER AVAILABILITY IN GRAPEVINE (VITIS VINIFERA L.)

Article number
931_15
Pages
143 – 150
Language
English
Abstract
The variability of water use efficiency was evaluated in a collection of 22 grapevine cultivars growing in an experimental farm near Palma.
Gas exchange parameters (net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration) were measured in leaves from May to August.
Additionally, water relation parameters (soil water potential, stem water potential), and grape yield and quality were also analyzed.
The results show that intrinsic water use efficiency (WUE, relation between net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance) measured in grapevine ranged from 42 to 78 µmol mol-1 in well watered plants, with most cultivars showing values around 60 µmol mol-1. When water deficit was progressively imposed, WUE increased while decreased stomatal conductance to 150 µmol mol-1. Under those conditions with very low soil water availability (soil water potential of -1,5 MPa), stomatal conductance ranged from 72 µmol mol-1 (‘Macabeo’ cultivar) to 156 µmol mol-1 (‘Argamusa’). Plant water status measured as stem water potential (Ψstem) under severe water stress conditions, ranged from -0.97 to -1.67 MPa, depending of the cultivar.
Interestingly, the cultivar ‘Macabeo’ showed the lowest WUE and the highest Ψstem (-0.975 MPa). Nevertheless, this cultivar had the highest yield (fruit production per plant). On the opposite, ‘Argamussa’ was the cultivar with highest WUE under water stress, because of a stronger stomatal adjustment under those conditions, maintaining high net photosynthesis rates.
This cultivar also showed a very low stem water potential (-1.48 MPa). The higher capacity of carbon fixation of this cultivar under water stress, was reflected in a high plant yield (7.8 kg grape per plant), although sugar concentration in must was very low.
Certain relationships were obtained between leaf carbon fixation and total yield and sugar content in must.

Publication
Authors
J.M. Escalona, M. Tomàs, M. Ribas-Carbo, H. Medrano, J. Bota
Keywords
water stress, δC13 isotopic discrimination, cultivar, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance
Full text
Online Articles (58)
F. de Herralde | R. Savé | M. Nadal | E. Pla | J.A. Lopez-Bustins
C. Baduca Campeanu | G. Beleniuc | V. Simionescu | L. Panaitescu | L. Grigorica
A.C. Malheiro | J.A. Santos | H. Fraga | J.G. Pinto
B. Di Lena | O. Silvestroni | L. Mariani | S. Parisi | F. Antenucci
M. Vujadinović | A. Vuković | V. Djurdjević | Z. Ranković-Vasić | Z. Atanacković | B. Sivčev | N. Marković | N. Petrović
H. Medrano | A. Pou | M. Tomàs | S. Martorell | J.M. Escalona | J. Gulias | J. Flexas
R. López-Urrea | A. Montoro | F. Mañas | P. López-Fuster | E. Fereres
J.W. Hornbuckle | E.W. Christen | N.J. Car | D. Smith | I. Goodwin | L. McClymont | B. Kerridge
J.M. Costa | C.M. Lopes | M.L. Rodrigues | T.P. Santos | R. Francisco | O. Zarrouk | A. Regalado | M.M. Chaves
J.C. Silvestre | S. Canas | J. Brazão | I. Caldeira | P. Clímaco | F. Duarte | N.S. Conceição | C. Arruda | M.I. Ferreira | A.C. Malheiro
L. Tarricone | G. Gentilesco | A. Ciccarese | A.M. Stellacci | P. Rubino
T. La Iacona | M. Sanna | F. Spanna | A. Schubert
D. Uriarte | J. Picón | L.A. Mancha | J. Blanco | M.H. Prieto | D. Moreno | E. Gamero | E. Valdés | D. Risco | J.R. Castel | D.S. Intrigliolo
A. Brasa Ramos | F. Montero Riquelme | F. Montero García | L. Orozco | J.J. Roncero
I.G. Santesteban | C. Miranda | J.B. Royo
A.M. Martínez-Gil | T. Garde-Cerdán | L. Martínez | G.L. Alonso | M. Rosario Salinas
I. Gómez | J. Revert | M.D. Esteve | M.D. Climent | A. Martínez | J. Jiménez | D.S. Intrigliolo
V. Maras | M. Tomic | V. Kodzulovic | B. Knezevic | D. Raicevic | M. Cizmovic
A.F. Brighenti | L. Rufato | A.A. Kretzschmar | D.A. Würz | A.E. Duarte | E. Brighenti | L.I. Malinovski | A.L. da Silva
A.F. Brighenti | L. Rufato | A.A. Kretzschmar | J.L. Marcon Filho | L.M. Brighenti | L.I. Malinovski | A.L. da Silva
H.G. Cardoso | A. Figueiredo | A. Baldé | M.S. Pais | A.A. Peixe
P. Hellin | J. Fenoll | S. Fuentes | L. Ruiz-Garcia | C. Martinez-Mora | A. Manso | P. Flores
L.I. Malinovski | L.J. Welter | A.F. Brighenti | H.J. Vieira | M.P. Guerra | A.L. Da Silva
F. Montero-García | F. Montero-Riquelme | A. Brasa-Ramos | G.J. Carsjens
G. Sorrentino | C. Pulvento | G. Cantilena | E. Sorrentino | M. Soprano
V. Maras | M. Tomic | V. Kodzulovic | D. Raicevic | M. Cizmovic