Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

CARBON FOOTPRINT OF DIFFERENT THINNING STRATEGIES IN A FRUIT ORCHARD

Article number
998_13
Pages
125 – 128
Language
English
Abstract
Thinning is a prerequisite in worldwide fruit production.
The question arose as to its contribution to the carbon footprint in different production schemes.
Carbon footprinting of thinning in fruit orchards is based on fossil fuel consumption, converted into greenhouse gas emission (GHG) and expressed as CO2 equivalents, which comprises carbon dioxide (CO2; factor 1), methane (CH4; factor 25) and nitrous oxides (N2O; factor 298), according to PAS 2050: Oct 2011 and PAS 2050-1 (hort). Flower thinning with ATS foliar nitrogen fertiliser emitted 25-37 kg CO2e/ha per treatment (without associated N2O emissions), while fruitlet thinning with 6-BA emitted ca. 13 kg CO2e/ha, Brevis 18.5 (single application) or 34 (double application) kg CO2e/ha and lime sulfur in organic orchards 27-42 kg CO2e/ha.
Mechanical thinning with the Bonner machine at 6 km/h at 360 rpm produced 27.9 kg CO2e/ha emissions, while manual fruitlet thinning after June drop had a carbon footprint of only 3.1 kg CO2e/ha, since manual labour does not utilize fossil fuel.

Publication
Authors
M.M. Blanke
Keywords
apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), climate change, greenhouse gas emission (GHG), life cycle assessment (LCA), primary energy use (PEU)
Full text
Online Articles (13)