Articles
THE CO2 FACTOR IN MODELLING PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND GROWTH OF GREENHOUSE CROPS
The results from the model were in agreement with the experimental date.
As next step predictions were made for the effects of CO2 concentration on crop production.
A realistic assessment of this problem requires not only knowledge about different physiological parameters but also about physical processes like ventilation and the calculation of the CO2 supply.
In the model it is assumed that CO2 is supplied by the combustion of natural gas in the heating system.
The amount of CO2 generated by the heating system appeared to be sufficient to elevate the CO2 concentration over a level of 340 vpm in january and february.
Afterwards the heat demand decreases and consequently not enough CO2 is available.
The combined effect of an increased irradiance (increase of photosynthesis) and a decreased heat demand (less CO2 supply) results in CO2 concentrations in the greenhouse considerably below ambient.
For a crop with a leaf area index of 3 the loss of net CO2 assimilation due to CO2 depletion was calculated to be about 15% in early spring (Schapendonk and Gaastra, 1984a). When long term effects of CO2 are taken into account for a crop planted early february the fruit production losses due to CO2 depletion were about 6900 kg/ha (11% of the total potential production when CO2 depletion is prevented). The costs of preventing CO2 depletion are calculated to be equivalent to 1421 m3 natural gas that have to be combusted additive to the normal heating purposes.
The data presented apply for a period of 63 days after planting.
Elevating the CO2 concentration to 1000 vpm would cost the equivalent of 16081 m3 of natural gas.
The simulated profit, compared with a crop that did not receive additional CO2 was 38500 kg/ha over this period.
The amount of CO2 that was lost through ventilation was accounted for.
