Articles

GENOTYPICAL DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO MICROPROPAGATION TECHNICS IN PRUNUS DOMESTICA

Article number
212_22
Pages
139 – 142
Language
Abstract
A sequence of media was devised to propagate in vitro some cultivars of Prunus domestica. The response of three cultivars (‘Stanley’, ‘President’ and ‘Bluefre’) was markedly different. ‘Stanley’ was the most reactive in producing rosettes while ‘President’ proliferated better and more profusely.

On the other hand this sequence did not work with ‘Bluefre’ which produced hardly any rosettes, thus hindering any further investigation.
From its behaviour it can be supposed that ‘Bluefre’ is especially and negatively sensitive to GA3.

Publication
Authors
R. Jona, R. Vigliocco
Keywords
Full text
Online Articles (130)
P.J. Mathias | P.G. Alderson | R.R.B. Leakey
A.N. Gonçalves | C. V. Almeida | O.J. Crocomo
M.J. Rodríguez Enríquez | J.R. Lorenzo Martín | A. García Rodríguez
Sant S. Bhojwani | K. Mullins | D. Cohen
I. Ilahi | M. Jabeen | A. Rehman
E. Rugini | P. Tarini | M.E. Rossodivita | S. Costanzo
A.M. Vieitez | A. Ballester | M.C. San-José | E. Vieitez
M. Meulemans | D. Dekegel | G. Vanheule
B.T. Posa | N.M. Calinawan | D.L. Sibal | S.C. Halos
P.G. Alderson | M.A. Harbour | P.A. Patience
S. Bouzid | I. Belcoura
C. Pérez | A. Rodríguez | A. Revilla | R. Rodríguez | R. Sánchez-Tamés
R. Gruselle | N. Badia | Ph. Boxus
L. Cremiere | H. Sbay | D. Prat
P. Périnet | F.M. Tremblay | C. Filion | L. Chatarpaul
D. Shlesinger | O. Reuveni | U. Lavi
N.M. ABRAMENKO | R.V. STAKANOVA | A.M. THCERNETS
N.V. Kataeva | R.G. Butenko
B. Gološin | L. Radojevic
B. Pevalek-Kozlina | S. Jelaska
H. Lilien-Kipnis | M. Kochba
R.S. Sangwan | C. Detrez | B.S. Sangwan-Norreel
J. Homes | M. Legros | M. Jaziri
M. VALLES | Ph. BOXUS
N. Banerjee | J. Schoofs | S. Hollevoet | F. Dumortier | E. De Langhe