Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

MODELING TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD INDUCTED FLOWERING IN LILIUM LONGIFLORUM

Article number
272_16
Pages
115 – 120
Language
Abstract
Emerged Lilium longiflorum Thunb. ‘Nellie White’ plants were placed for 6 weeks at one of 11 temperatures ranging from -2.5°C to 22.5°C (2.5° increments) and were exposed to a PPF of 10 μmol·s-1·m-2 from incandescent lamps for 9 hours per day (SD) or 24 hours per day (LD) during the temperature treatments (Experiment I). Unemerged plants were held at each temperature for either 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks and emerged shoots were exposed to a PPF of 10 μmol·s-1·m-2 from incandescent lamps for 9 hours per day (Experiment II). After termination of the storage treatments, plants from both experiments were grown at 20°C in a greenhouse with a 9 hour photoperiod.
The effectiveness of a treatment in promoting flowering was determined by multiplying the relative effectiveness of a treatment in reducing total leaf number by the flowering percentage of the treatment.
The relative effectiveness of temperature in promoting flowering increased as the temperature decreased from 22.5°C to 5°C and as the treatment duration increased from 2 to 8 weeks.
All plants treated at 22.5°C remained vegetative irrespective of duration or photoperiod.
Short day plants had increasingly more leaves and flowers than long day plants as the treatment temperature increased from 0°C to 15°C. Long days were; at most, 47% as effective as a 5°C temperature treatment in promoting flowering.
The effect of temperature and long days on flower induction was additive.
All plants treated at -2.5°C froze.

Publication
Authors
Nathan E. Lange, Royal D. Heins
Keywords
Full text
Online Articles (51)
R.T. Perkins III | L.C. Ewart
Meriam G. Karlsson | M. E. Hackmann | Royal D. Heins
Daniel J. Jacques | J.C. Peterson | R.E.J. Boerner
Robert D. Berghage | Royal D. Heins | John E. Erwin
X. Zhang | D.J. Beattie | J.W. White
S. Derthick | D. W. H. Carlson