Articles
Environmental assessment of contrasted French organic vegetable farms
Article number
1355_27
Pages
209 – 216
Language
English
Abstract
French organic vegetable farms are diverse, ranging from complex biodiversity-based systems, with many vegetables, to simple input-based systems with few vegetables, suggesting potentially different impacts on the environment.
We used life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the impact of three contrasted farms: MF, a microfarm with a high crop diversity and a low input level, SP, a medium-sized farm specialized in sheltered production with a low crop diversity and a high input level, and OP, a large farm specialized in outdoor production with intermediate input level and crop diversity.
To cope with the complexity of organic vegetable farms, we opted for a system LCA, based on farm inputs and outputs for a one-year period.
Using mass-, and area-based functional units, we analyzed the impacts on climate change, land competition, biodiversity, and the use of plastic.
Per ha, differences between the systems were large for climate change.
SP had the highest impacts, whereas OP had the lowest impacts.
Expressed per kg, differences between the systems for climate change were much smaller, even ranking differently.
OP used much less plastic but performed worse on biodiversity and land competition.
Despite its higher yield, SP did not perform better than other farms on impacts per kg for climate change, and plastic use.
The impact on on-farm biodiversity showed contrasting results compared to the other impacts.
It highlighted the importance of semi-natural habitats.
The quantification of plastic use echoed growing concerns on (micro-)plastic pollution in agricultural soils and landscapes.
We used life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the impact of three contrasted farms: MF, a microfarm with a high crop diversity and a low input level, SP, a medium-sized farm specialized in sheltered production with a low crop diversity and a high input level, and OP, a large farm specialized in outdoor production with intermediate input level and crop diversity.
To cope with the complexity of organic vegetable farms, we opted for a system LCA, based on farm inputs and outputs for a one-year period.
Using mass-, and area-based functional units, we analyzed the impacts on climate change, land competition, biodiversity, and the use of plastic.
Per ha, differences between the systems were large for climate change.
SP had the highest impacts, whereas OP had the lowest impacts.
Expressed per kg, differences between the systems for climate change were much smaller, even ranking differently.
OP used much less plastic but performed worse on biodiversity and land competition.
Despite its higher yield, SP did not perform better than other farms on impacts per kg for climate change, and plastic use.
The impact on on-farm biodiversity showed contrasting results compared to the other impacts.
It highlighted the importance of semi-natural habitats.
The quantification of plastic use echoed growing concerns on (micro-)plastic pollution in agricultural soils and landscapes.
Authors
A. Pépin, M. Trydeman Knudsen, K. Morel, D. Grasselly, H.M.G. van der Werf
Keywords
life cycle assessment, agroecology, horticulture, organic farming, biodiversity
Online Articles (60)