Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

BASELINE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CODLING MOTH TO TWO REDUCED-RISK INSECTICIDES IN WALNUTS

Article number
1050_34
Pages
259 – 262
Language
English
Abstract
Codling moth (CM), Cydia pomonella (L), is the key pest of walnuts in California.
Control of CM has relied on repeated applications of broad-spectrum insecticides.
However, because of secondary pest outbreaks and environmental concerns, the agricultural chemical industries have recently developed a number of reduced-risk insecticides, e.g., spinetoram and chlorantraniliprole.
Spinetoram is an excellent larvicide with some adulticide activity and chlorantraniliprole is an excellent ovicide and larvicide for control of CM in walnuts.
Since resistance to these two insecticides is likely in the future, studies were undertaken to determine their baseline susceptibility of CM in walnuts before widespread use.
In untreated orchards, CM adults and larvae were collected and exposed to various concentrations of each insecticide.
Dose mortality lines were developed for spinetoram (adults only) and chlorantraniliprole (mature larvae only). The adult male LD50 for spinetoram was calculated as 0.15 mg tech ai/ml.
The LD50 for spinetoram is about the same as the typical field rate.
The mature field collected larval LC50 for chlorantraniliprole was calculated as 0.023 mg tech ai/ml.
The use of mature larvae as the target stage was necessary since chlorantraniliprole was not effective against adults and it is not possible to collect eggs or neonate larvae in the field.
The LC50 for chlorantraniliprole is about 4 times lower than the typical field rate.
The ratio of LC50 to typical field rate is far less than desirable and indicated that field resistance of CM to chlorantraniliprole may occur in a short period of time.
However, the use of mature larvae may underestimate the toxicity of chlorantraniliprole.

Publication
Authors
R.A. Van Steenwyk, F. Cave, L.M. Novotny, S.C. Welter, W.W. Coates
Keywords
Cydia pomonella, resistance, walnuts, spinetoram, chlorantraniliprole
Full text
Online Articles (57)
G.A. Wang | X.Y. Shang | Q. Zhang | Y. Abduxukur | M.M. Huang
Guoliang Wu | Yina Wang | Qihai Wang | Ning Ding | Chengzhong Ren
D. Hassani | R. Dastjerdi | R. Haghjooyan | A. Soleimani | M. Keshavarzi | J. Atefi | M. Mozaffari | R. Rezaee | A. Fahadan | A. Rahmanian
G.A. Wang | Q. Zhang | M.M. Huang | A. Yakup
Yanping Yu | Dengchao Zhao | Yizeng Hu | Chuanming Han | Liqun Hou
G. Xin | J.D. Zhang | H.M. Wang | H. Wang | Y.Q. Hu | H.Y. Zhang | H.H. Mao | F.T. Jia
S. Cosmulescu | M. Botu | G. Achim | A. Baciu | M. Gruia | I. Trandafir
U. Ertürk | T. Şisman | C. Yerlikaya | O. Ertürk | T. Karadeniz
R.A. Van Steenwyk | F. Cave | L.M. Novotny | S.C. Welter | W.W. Coates
R.A. Van Steenwyk | L.M. Novotny | L. Thayer | G.B. Weiss | W.W. Coates | A. Verhaeghe | J.A. Grant | J.K. Hasey
M. Yalçin | T. Acican | K. Alibaş | U. Ertürk | Y. Akça | R. Polat
R.P. Buchner | C. Gilles | W.H. Olson | J.E. Adaskaveg | S.E. Lindow | R. Koutsoukis
Wang Qing-hai | Liu Xing-hong | Duan Chun-hua | Niu Shan-guang | Zhang Wei
N. Aletà | A. Vilanova | E. Tomàs | M. Guàrdia
D. Hassani | R. Dastjerdi | A. Soleimani | M. Jaffaraghaei | R. Rezaee | K. Vahdati | A. Dehghani | H. Hadadnejhad | M. Asefnokhostin | M. Mozaffari | S. Eskandari