Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

BARK REACTION OF DIFFERENT OAK SPECIES TO CRYPHONECTRIA PARASITICA

Article number
844_60
Pages
433 – 438
Language
English
Abstract
Our main goal was to study the susceptibility of oak species to the plant pathogenic fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Virulence of different isolates was examined on dormant sticks of 9 different oak species (Quercus spp.) and on European chestnut (Castanea sativa) as a control.
Branches were infected with virulent isolates.
The experiments were done in 4 repetitions.
The treated branches were inoculated for 36 days, and then the size of caused cankers were measured.
The necroses were ellipse shaped mostly.
Shorter and longer diagonals of the ellipses were measured, and the size of the damaged bark surface was determined by using the ellipse calculation formula [(axb)xpi]. According to the results achieved red oak (Quercus rubra) was extremely susceptible to the fungus.
Necrosis on the red oak caused by C. parasitica were significantly bigger in size than those were on the chestnut branches. Q. rubra and C. sativa were more susceptible than other tree species, and sessile oak (Q. petraea) and the pedunculate oak (Q. robur) also showed a great susceptibility.
Nesroses were the smallest on Q. robur f. fastigiata.

Publication
Authors
G. Tarcali, L. Radócz, A. Jenei, J. Tóth
Keywords
Cryphonectria parasitica, virulence, Quercus spp., blight symptoms
Full text
Online Articles (66)
Wang Tie-ming | Jiang Xue-fu | Wang Dong-li | Yang Dong-sheng | Qin Ling
C. Marinelli | M. Migliorini | L. Funghini | T. Turchetti | B. Zanoni | S. Canuti
I.R. Donis-Gonzalez | C. Medina-Mora | S. Stadt | M. Mandujano | D.W. Fulbright
Bu Tian | Han Tao | Zhang Hai-ying | Li Hong-wei | Li Li-ping
Zhu Xiao-qing | Wang Hai-xia | Qin Ling | Liu Su-hua | Liu Zheng-ping | Wei Yan-min
Qi Jing-hua | Wu Jun | Xu Yi-qing | Wang Fang | Pang Mei-xia | Huang Man-qing
J. Gomes-Laranjo | P. Almeida | J. Ferreira-Cardoso | F. Peixoto
S.C.S. Bueno | T. Tokunaga | A.J. Berti | E.L. Coutinho | A.H. Maia | O.K. Yamanishi
G. Ferreira | G.R. Santos | P.N. Costa | S.C.S. Bueno | M.M. Mischan | O.K. Yamanishi
Zheng Cheng-le | Pan Dong-ming | Zhang Dai-cheng | Wu Xian-zhi | Lv Jia-min | Yu Xiao-qu | Wu Feng-fu | Zheng Jiu-he
Zheng Cheng-le | Pan Teng-fei | Pan Dong-ming | Wu Xian-zhi
L.-T. Dinis | A. Luzio | J. Ferreira-Cardoso | F. Peixoto | R. Costa | J. Gomes-Laranjo
Li Guo-tian | Ai Cheng-xiang | Zhang Li-si | Wei Hai-rong | Liu Qing-zhong
N. Islam-Faridi | C.D. Nelson | P.H. Sisco | T.L. Kubisiak | F.V. Hebard | R.L. Paris | R.L. Phillips
Guochen Yang | Zhongge (Cindy) Lu | T.M. Asante | P.E. Read
P.H. Sisco | R.R. Sederoff | J.P. Tomkins | J.E. Carlson | T.L. Kubisiak | M.E. Staton | F.V. Hebard | S.L. Anagnostakis | W.A. Powell | C.P. Smith
B. Cuenca | L. González | L. Ocaña | M. Rey | M. López | M.V. González
Cao Qing-qin | Yang Kai | Zhen Zhen | Feng Yong-qing | Qin Ling
Ding Ning | Yang Kai | Hua Bao-guang | Shen Yuan-yue | Qin Ling
Chen Jian-Hua | Su Dong-Mei | Zhu Fan | Luo Li-Hua | Yang Ding-Hai
D. Torello Marinoni | M.G. Mellano | P. Guaraldo | A. Akkak | G. Bounous | R. Botta
G.S. Germinara | A. De Cristofaro | G. Rotundo | B. Paparatti | S. Speranza | E. Stacchiotti
B. Cuenca | M.R. Fernández | L. Ocaña | C. Salinero | C. Pintos | J.P. Mansilla | C. Rial
G. Tarcali | L. Radócz | A. Jenei | J. Tóth
A. Vannini | S. Franceschini | G. Vuono | G. Natili | R. Paganini | A.M. Vettraino