Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

THE INFLUENCE OF REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION (RDI) ON THE GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY OF PEACH TREES

Article number
315_26
Pages
211 – 218
Language
Abstract
The trial was carried out on an eight year old peach orchard, cultivar Flavortop, grafted on peach seedling and trained as palmette.
Three different irrigation volumes, determinated through an "A Class Evaporimeter", have been compared in different phenological phases.

The amount of water was calculated as follows:

  • treatment 1: from the begining of irrigation until the shoots reached about 80% of their total estimated length, corresponding to about 25% of full fruit size, 12.5% of ETP was distributed: the total ETP (100%) was reached at the end of harvest.
    The amount of irrigation applied for the remaining period was again 12.5% of ETP;

  • treatment 2: during the first and last period the coefficient used was double compared to treatment 1, while during the intermediate period, prior to harvest, the irrigation volumes were equal to the evaporate (100%);

  • treatment 3: the coefficients used were the ones which gave the best results in previous trials with the same cultivar in the same field.
    This corresponds, for the entire irrigation period, until fruit set (A) to 66% of evaporation multiplied by 50%. These values were increased up to 100% for the last three weeks before harvest.
    After harvest the coefficient was reduced to the previous level (50%).

No significant differences appeared between treatment 1 and 3 on the yield per tree during the different years.
The average fruit weight was pratically the same in all the three treatments.

On the contrary, pruning wood weight and trunk cross-sectional area, resulted proportional to the water used (higher in treatment 3 and lower in treatment 1). However the efficiency production index shows that no differences were found between treatments 1 and 3.

With the R D I method it is possible to save almost one third of the water amount (35.5%) under the conditions of our trial.

Publication
Authors
G. Strabbioli
Keywords
Full text
Online Articles (29)
M. Augustì | V. Almela | J.R. Aliaga | B. Pascual
E. Bellini | E. Picardi | I. Sabbatini | G. Giannelli
E. Bellini | E. Giordani | E. Picardi | G. Giannelli
A.F. Iezzoni | L. Chang | G. Adams
A. Liverani | D. Cobianchi | A. Crociani | D. Missere
S.A. Paunovic | A.S. Paunovic | T.M. Milosevic | M.J. Tisma | A. Obradovic
G. Scalabrelli | L. Di Marco | R. Messina | E. Peterlunger
W. Qiangsheng | S. Yinping | W. Jinzheng | S. Congyi