Articles
EVALUATION OF EUROPEAN PLUM ROOTSTOCKS TO TWO PLUM CULTIVARS IN LATVIA
Article number
732_38
Pages
261 – 265
Language
English
Abstract
The performance of eight generatively propagated rootstocks (St-Julien INRA 2, St-Julien dOrléans, St-Julien Noir, Brompton, Wangenheims Cwetche, St-Julien Wädenswill, Myrobalana and Caucasian plum (a local rootstock)) and 8 vegetatively propagated rootstocks (St-Julien A, Brompton, Ackermann, Pixy, Hamyra, P. Marianna GF8/1, G5/22 and GF655/2) grafted with the European plum cultivar Victoria and diploid plum cultivar Kometa Kubanskaya were evaluated in a field trial in Latvia.
The winter of 2002/03 had low temperatures of 36°C at snow level in the orchard.
The degree of frost damage, general tree health and tree growth parameters were observed in order to evaluate tree winter hardiness and renovation ability.
The rootstocks had some influence on the tree winter hardiness.
All of the European rootstocks had similar or better winter hardiness than the local rootstock Caucasian plum.
The winter of 2002/03 had low temperatures of 36°C at snow level in the orchard.
The degree of frost damage, general tree health and tree growth parameters were observed in order to evaluate tree winter hardiness and renovation ability.
The rootstocks had some influence on the tree winter hardiness.
All of the European rootstocks had similar or better winter hardiness than the local rootstock Caucasian plum.
Publication
Authors
J. Lepsis, U. Dekens
Keywords
Prunus domestica, Prunus cerasifera, winter hardiness, cultivars
Online Articles (104)
