Articles
Economic evaluation of manual and robotic transplanting of plant cuttings
Article number
1271_31
Pages
221 – 226
Language
English
Abstract
Transplanting of unrooted plant cuttings into propagation trays is a manufacturing process that requires considerable labor, especially during the peak season.
The objective was to benchmark the labor efficiency of the manual transplant process and evaluate return on investment of automation.
Data were collected on the transplanting process of 14 large U.S greenhouse companies.
Manually transplanting required 6.4±2.7 s (mean±st.err.) at a cost of $0.023±$0.003 per cutting.
Differences in labor cost resulted from both the plant type produced in each location and the hourly wage which ranged from $9.23 to $18.66 and averaged $12.49±0.78. To evaluate automation, data on labor, cuttings transplanted, and costs of automation were collected from five growers using transplant robots.
A return on investment spreadsheet model was developed that allowed customized analysis of individual greenhouse businesses.
The number of cuttings transplanted in the sampled firms under investigation averaged 29.3M cuttings per year, with a weekly peak of 2.1M cuttings.
Four transplant robots capable of transplanting 2000 cuttings per hour operated for up to 76 h per week during the peak and transplanted 17.4M cuttings per year (59% of the total). This equipment had a capital cost of $500,000. The average automated cost was $0.010 per cutting compared with $0.014 for manual transplanting.
With these assumptions, the robotic transplanter would yield a yearly saving of $62,488, and would reduce labor requirement during the peak week by 9 full-time equivalents (15% of total workforce). However, with a 5% discount rate the net present value (NPV) over 10 years was slightly negative (-$17,487). In contrast, if wages increased to $20 the NPV was highly positive ($960,358). Results emphasize the need for careful and customized analysis by growers to ensure profitability from automation.
Results will help growers highlight management practices to improve efficiency of the manual process, and evaluate how robotics could benefit producers in terms of labor cost and availability.
The objective was to benchmark the labor efficiency of the manual transplant process and evaluate return on investment of automation.
Data were collected on the transplanting process of 14 large U.S greenhouse companies.
Manually transplanting required 6.4±2.7 s (mean±st.err.) at a cost of $0.023±$0.003 per cutting.
Differences in labor cost resulted from both the plant type produced in each location and the hourly wage which ranged from $9.23 to $18.66 and averaged $12.49±0.78. To evaluate automation, data on labor, cuttings transplanted, and costs of automation were collected from five growers using transplant robots.
A return on investment spreadsheet model was developed that allowed customized analysis of individual greenhouse businesses.
The number of cuttings transplanted in the sampled firms under investigation averaged 29.3M cuttings per year, with a weekly peak of 2.1M cuttings.
Four transplant robots capable of transplanting 2000 cuttings per hour operated for up to 76 h per week during the peak and transplanted 17.4M cuttings per year (59% of the total). This equipment had a capital cost of $500,000. The average automated cost was $0.010 per cutting compared with $0.014 for manual transplanting.
With these assumptions, the robotic transplanter would yield a yearly saving of $62,488, and would reduce labor requirement during the peak week by 9 full-time equivalents (15% of total workforce). However, with a 5% discount rate the net present value (NPV) over 10 years was slightly negative (-$17,487). In contrast, if wages increased to $20 the NPV was highly positive ($960,358). Results emphasize the need for careful and customized analysis by growers to ensure profitability from automation.
Results will help growers highlight management practices to improve efficiency of the manual process, and evaluate how robotics could benefit producers in terms of labor cost and availability.
Authors
P.R. Fisher, Y.U. Adegbola, A.W. Hodges
Keywords
automation, cuttings, investment, propagation, robotics, transplant
Groups involved
- Division Greenhouse and Indoor Production Horticulture
- Division Precision Horticulture and Engineering
- Division Plant-Environment Interactions in Field Systems
- Working Group Nettings in Horticulture (subgroup of Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climates)
- Working Group Light in Horticulture
- Working Group Organic Greenhouse Horticulture
- Working Group Modelling Plant Growth, Environmental Control, Greenhouse Environment
- Working Group Protected Cultivation, Nettings and Screens for Mild Climates
- Working Group Vegetable Grafting
- Working Group Computational Fluid Dynamics in Agriculture
- Working Group Design and Automation in Integrated Indoor Production Systems
- Working Group Mechanization, Digitization, Sensing and Robotics
- Working Group Greenhouse Environment and Climate Control
- Commission Agroecology and Organic Farming Systems
Online Articles (65)
