Articles
Field performance of peach rootstock cultivars in South Carolina
Article number
1352_8
Pages
63 – 68
Language
English
Abstract
Three peach rootstock trials were established in South Carolina between 2013 and 2017 to evaluate new rootstock cultivars for yield, resistance to Peach Tree Short Life (e.g., bacterial canker), Armillaria root rot tolerance, and tree vigor.
In a high density, Y-trained 2017 trial, Rootpac® 40′, Controller 7′, Controller 8′ and MP-29′ produced the smallest trees after 5 years 38 to 48% of Guardian®. Rootpac® 20′ produced the most root suckers.
Bloom and maturity dates were advanced 2 to 3 days on Rootpac® 20′, Rootpac® 40′, and Guardian® compared to Lovell.
However, an adjacent open center, 2013 trial there were few differences in phenology among rootstocks except MP-29′ advanced maturity.
Yields in the Y-trial were highest for the vigorous rootstocks Lovell and Guardian® as well as Rootpac® 20′. In comparison in the 2013 trial, yields were highest for peach seedling cultivars and Rootpac® R’. In the Y-trial, Rootpac® 40′ was 48% smaller than Rootpac® 20′, which was contrary to the release descriptions.
Similarly, Controller 6′ was ~38% larger than Controller 7′ and 8′, which was unexpected.
For the two other older trials, the cultivars Rootpac® 20′, 40′, 70′, R’, and Tempropac®‘ had tree mortalities as high as 78-100% due to bacterial canker.
European interspecific hybrid rootstocks had fair to poor survival, in contrast to only a few dead trees on P. persica rootstocks. MP-29′, considered a Peach Tree Short Life resistant rootstock, was resistant to Armillaria in a 9-year trial.
European rootstock cultivars were not well adapted.
Future research will focus on the semi-dwarfing and better adapted MP-29′ and Controller®‘ rootstocks for intensive orchard systems.
In a high density, Y-trained 2017 trial, Rootpac® 40′, Controller 7′, Controller 8′ and MP-29′ produced the smallest trees after 5 years 38 to 48% of Guardian®. Rootpac® 20′ produced the most root suckers.
Bloom and maturity dates were advanced 2 to 3 days on Rootpac® 20′, Rootpac® 40′, and Guardian® compared to Lovell.
However, an adjacent open center, 2013 trial there were few differences in phenology among rootstocks except MP-29′ advanced maturity.
Yields in the Y-trial were highest for the vigorous rootstocks Lovell and Guardian® as well as Rootpac® 20′. In comparison in the 2013 trial, yields were highest for peach seedling cultivars and Rootpac® R’. In the Y-trial, Rootpac® 40′ was 48% smaller than Rootpac® 20′, which was contrary to the release descriptions.
Similarly, Controller 6′ was ~38% larger than Controller 7′ and 8′, which was unexpected.
For the two other older trials, the cultivars Rootpac® 20′, 40′, 70′, R’, and Tempropac®‘ had tree mortalities as high as 78-100% due to bacterial canker.
European interspecific hybrid rootstocks had fair to poor survival, in contrast to only a few dead trees on P. persica rootstocks. MP-29′, considered a Peach Tree Short Life resistant rootstock, was resistant to Armillaria in a 9-year trial.
European rootstock cultivars were not well adapted.
Future research will focus on the semi-dwarfing and better adapted MP-29′ and Controller®‘ rootstocks for intensive orchard systems.
Publication
Authors
G.L. Reighard, D. Ouellette, I.S. Minas
Keywords
Prunus persica, Prunus hybrids, dwarfing, Peach Tree Short Life, Armillaria tabescens
Groups involved
Online Articles (87)
