Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

A TEN-YEAR HORTICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF THREE TRAINING SYSTEMS IN THE HOOD RIVER VALLEY: HORTICULTURE

Article number
475_26
Pages
205 – 212
Language
Abstract
A ten-year comparison of the Tatura and Lincoln Canopy trellises and a conventional system with d’Anjou and Bartlett pears demonstrated that the Tatura Trellis out yielded the conventional system by almost 70 t/ha for d’Anjou and 64 t/ha for Bartlett.
The Lincoln Canopy was about half as productive as the Tatura for d’Anjou and similar to the conventional system for Bartlett.
Fruit size averaged approximately 15% larger in the Tatura system for both cultivars.
Harvest maturity was delayed in the Tatura and Lincoln Canopy systems.
Harvest efficiency was increased 40% in the Tatura and 26% in the Lincoln Canopy.
Nine tree densities ranging from 598 to 1281 trees/ha were included in the trial.
In the Conventional system tree densities greater than 850 trees/ha resulted in yield reductions by year eight.
This was not a problem with the Tatura Trellis.
Increased fruit size and quality increased grower returns over $40/ton for d’Anjou and $80/ton for Bartlett.
The Tatura system cost an additional $10,000/ha.
However, the earlier yields and higher fruit value offset the additional establishment costs.

Publication
Authors
E.A. Mielke, C.F. Seavert
Keywords
Pyrus communis, Tatura Trellis, Lincoln Canopy Trellis, Bartlett, d’Anjou
Full text
Online Articles (74)
M.C. Dussi | M. Leskovar | M. Giacinti | S.E. Dussi
L. Buzássy | K. Gerendás | J. Nyéki | J. Garics | M. Obrecánné Koszegi | A. Porpáczy
J. Carsalade | J. Díaz | D. Soto
F. Inántsy | T. Szabó | J. Iváncsics | J. Nyéki | E. Dibuz | M. Soltész | M. Hunyady
M. Milutinovic | R. Miletic | R. Petrovic | D. Nikolic | M.M. Milutinovic
T. Szabó | J. Iváncsics | E. Dibuz | F. Inántsy | M. Soltész | J. Nyéki | M. Hunyady
I. Béres | J. Iváncsics | J. Nyéki
M. Soltész | J. Iváncsics | T. Szabó | J. Nyéki | Z. Szabó
J. Nyéki | A. Porpáczy | M. Soltész | Z. Szabó | J. Iváncsics
M. Babovic | A. Bulajic | G. Delibašic
D. Sugar | D.G. Richardson | P.M. Chen | R.A. Spotts | R.G. Roberts | T. Chand-Goyal
J.P. Joublan | A. Venegas | R. Wilckens | M. Espinoza