Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

THE EFFECT OF ROOTSTOCK AND APPLIED WATER ON VINE WATER STATUS AND GAS EXCHANGE OF CABERNET SAUVIGNON

Article number
526_13
Pages
163 – 168
Language
English
Abstract
The effects of three rootstocks (5C, 110R and 3309C) and four irrigation treatments on leaf water potential and gas exchange of Cabernet Sauvignon grown in the Napa Valley of California were investigated during the 1996 growing season.
The irrigation treatments were fractions (0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.5) of estimated full vineyard evapotranspiration (ETc). Estimated full ETc was determined by multiplying a crop coefficient developed in the Napa Valley with daily potential ET. Irrigations commenced the first week of July with water applications occurring once a week.
The crop coefficient increased from 0.45 the first week in July to 0.7 just prior to harvest (September 12). The greatest amount of applied water for the 1.0 irrigation treatment prior to harvest was 64 liters vine-1 week-1, the first week in September.
There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in both pre-dawn and midday measurements of leaf water potential (psi1) as a function of irrigation treatments towards the end of summer.
There were no significant differences in psi1 among rootstocks.
Midday measures of net CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance were significantly greater for the 1.0 and 1.5 irrigation treatments compared to the 0.5 and 0.75 treatments.
Cabernet Sauvignon grafted onto the 5C rootstock had greater yields when compared to the other two rootstocks.
The results indicate that while irrigation amounts affected vine water status the first year of this study it was the rootstock that significantly affected fruit composition and vine productivity.

Publication
Authors
I. Abu-Hilal, G. Collesano, Larry E. Williams
Keywords
evapotranspiration, leaf water potential, net CO2 assimilation rate, Vitis vinifera L.
Full text
Online Articles (54)
E. Miklós | L. Szõke | P. Kozma | L. Erdei
C. Lovisolo | A. Schubert | E. Peterlunger | S. Ferraris
M. Gómez-del-Campo | C. Ruiz | V. Sotés | J. Lissarrague
K. A. Loulakakis | K. A. Roubelakis-Angelakis
V. Licina | M. Jakovljevic | S. Antic-Mladenovic
E. Miklós | Zs. Szegletes | L. Erdei
S.G. Veliksar | S.I. Toma | R.F. Syrcu | V.M. Busuioc | A.I. Zemshman
M. Moriondo | B. Gozzini | L. Fibbi | S. Orlandini | M. Bindi
A. K. Papadakis | A. Marco | C. I. Siminis | K. A. Roubelakis-Angelakis
N. Terrier | N. Issaly | F. Sauvage | A. Ageorges | C. Romieu
P. Diakou | A. Moing | N. Ollat | C. Rothan | J. Gaudillère
F. Battistutta | G. Colugnati | F. Bregant | G. Crespan | I. Tonetti | E. Celotti | R. Zironi
G. Colugnati | F. Battistutta | F. Bregant | G. Crespan | E. Celotti | R. Zironi
E. Kraeva | A. Renault | N. Terrier | C. Tesnière | C. Romieu | F. Sauvage | J. Bierne | A. Deloire
M. J. Striem | Bruce L. Reisch | Julie R. Kikkert
C. Fregoni | L. Bavaresco | E. Cantù | D. Petegolli | D. Vizzon | G. Chiusa | M. Trevisan