Optical, acoustic and textural attributes in ‘Braeburn’ and ‘Nicoter’ (Kanzi^®) apple resulting from different pre- and postharvest conditions

In light of the hypercompetitive conditions currently ruling the apple fruit market, supplying the consumers with fruit of high quality, even after long storage, is crucial for the producer’s continued existence on the market.
One of the most important quality constituent of apple fruit, regardless of cultivar, is its texture, which, when unsatisfactory, overrides all other quality aspects.
A suitable instrumental predictor of sensorial perception of firmness is Magness Taylor penetrometric test.
One of the alternatives to this destructive test might be the acoustic measurement of firmness, calculated from the frequency of the sound emitted by fruit following a gentle tap.
Additionally also fruit’s spectral signature in visible light, mainly in the range of chlorophyll absorption, as well as chlorophyll fluorescence have been considered as indicators of apple fruit firmness.
However, the attempts to determine the quality of fruit with these techniques have yielded conflicting results, with some studies demonstrating very strong, whilst some almost non-existent correlations with the reference standards.
It is likely that different environmental, production and postharvest factors are responsible for de-coupling of the normally synchronized processes conjointly referred to as “fruit ripening and quality development”. The objective of the present study, done on apple fruit of two commercial cultivars (‘Nicoter’, ‘Braeburn’) with differing softening behaviour, was to observe the time-course development of the mentioned optical (I_AD, SFR_R), acoustic (AFS) as well as reference (MT firmness) indices resulting from different environmental, pre- and postharvest conditions.
Measurements were conducted at harvest, multiple times during CA storage, and during shelf life.
The results revealed clear differences between cultivars, climate conditions and cultural practices for most monitored parameters and strengths of their correlations.
The general trend of MT FFF and AFS changes during CA storage was very similar.
Nevertheless, AFS was not a good indicator of firmness per se.
However, the initial AFS values hinted on FFF changes during SL. The only strong correlations between the different monitored parameters were obtained for the two optical indices (IAD and SFR_R). Further investigations are required for the optimization of the studied non-destructive techniques for assessing fruit quality, before they can be used for practical applications.

VIII International Postharvest Symposium: Enhancing Supply Chain and Consumer Benefits – Ethical and Technological Issues

N. Sadar, G. Agati, A. Zanella

apple maturity, acoustic stiffness, firmness, chlorophyll fluorescence, I_AD

https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1194.107