Most popular articles
Everything About Peaches. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Everything About Peaches Website: whether you are a professional or backyard peach...
Mission Statement. For the sake of mankind and the world as a whole a further increase of the sustainability...
Newsletter 9: July 2013 - Temperate Fruits in the Tropics and Subtropics. Download your copy of the Working Group Temperate...
USA Walnut varieties. The Walnut Germplasm Collection of the University of California, Davis (USA). A description of the Collection and a History...
China Walnut varieties.

Articles

ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH AND CROPPING OF THE PLUM TREE ORIGINATED FROM IN VITRO.

Article number
478_29
Pages
187 – 192
Language
Abstract
The trees of two plum cultivars Stanley and Sweet Common Prune (Prunus domestica L.) originated from in vitro and grafted on Cherry Plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) rootstock were compared.
The cultivar Stanley propagated in vitro can be recommended for the commercial orchards.
There were no differences in coming into bearing, the yield size, the fruit size, susceptibility to plum pox virus in comparison with the trees grafted on the rootstock.
The micropropagated Sweet Common Prune trees were less vigorous by 50 % and it was the only advantageous of TC trees in comparison with the grafted ones.

Publication
Authors
W. Lech, M. Malodobry, E. Dziedzic, T. Faber
Keywords
plum, in vitro, tree growth, crop
Full text
Online Articles (56)
Z.S. Grzyb | E. Rozpara
E. Bellini | E. Giordani | V. Nencetti | D. Paffetti
E. Bellini | V. Nencetti | S. Nin | S. Paraluppi
K. Hrotkó | L. Magyar | G. Simon | T. Klenyán
E. Dziedzic | W. Lech | M. Malodobry | A. Jankun
E. Rozpara | J. Dominikowski | Z. S. Grzyb
E. Rozpara | Z.S. Grzyb | A. Czynczyk | H. Zdyb
F. Paprštein | R. Karešová | M. Navrátil
I.M. Vitanova | D.A. Ivanova | S.D. Dimkova
I.M. Vitanova | S.D. Dimkova | D.A. Ivanova